Language Analysis of Freedom

Pocket

[Total: 0    Average: 0/5]

The language analysis of Freedom by Jonathan Franzen brings out the power of good writing. The author here is able to draw to attention the vibrant personality of each of his characters by use of language. Franzen makes use of very distinctive characters that he so forthrightly explains in the course of writing the novel which in return captures the attention of the reader.


He brings out language use so artistically by his inventiveness in grammar as well as his keen word choice. He uses several language elements like sentence, phrase, quotations, capitalization, word and punctuation among others to demonstrate how it is possible to change tone, include humor, to cause the reader to pause and for storage combination.

Franzen makes use of sentences in such a way that stands out to the reader.  He writes that she confided that shed been forbidden to fertilize Walters Flowers after what had happened last time 5. This makes the reader to think what happened last time in there. Oh what have happened? This makes the reader pause for a minute. In pg 6 2nd P, there are 14 question marks which in return makes the reader to think deep.

In being specific about Volvo 240 and Ramsey Hill in pg106 whatever the reader likes NOT is capitalized giving an impression of anger, or emphasis and cause of the frustration. In addition, he capitalizes all Js and they are Jewish which implies that he is dealing with important Jewish issues. A hyphen is used when talking about Jessica in p8 to show that she is not the center of attraction and is less dramatic in her life.

Franzens use of storage combination that doesn’t flow together forces the others to pay attention to the text. For instance page 337, he writes that Lalitha took the back road out of Beckly at highly illegal speeds the words had different syllables one to three, do not flow together and makes the leader to go on. the same thing is on page 155, 2nd P, she stood up carefully the words are organized in such a way like one syllable then 2-1-2-1-2-3 they don’t flow together at all, but at the same time ends up being interesting.

The author capitalizes ordinary words and special capitalization to stand out. Throughout the book, Franzen capitalizes the word OK, which I believe is intended at making the reader pause and pay attention to the text. On page 333 2nd P he writes I KNOW ITS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN he capitalizes the whole sentence to make it stand out to the reader and make them wonder why he did it and why it is never going to happen, this makes the reader to go on and keep reading the text, and know that the character is shouting and angry.

In his book, Franzen uses phrases interestingly throughout the book. This helps the reader to think and continue reading. In page 560 he writes new neighbor was too dangerous a phrase that remains in the mind of the reader. Furthermore, sentences have hyphens and humor in them. He uses hyphens between two different words to show the contrast between the two sentences for example page 175, he writes like he didn’t like it-but he still did it.
James Peter is the author and is associated with meldaresearch.com which is a global custom thesis writing  provider. If you would like help in essays, research papers, term papers and dissertations, you can visit BestEssaySite.Com

© 2018: BusinessCustomWriting.Com, All Rights Reserved | Innovation Theme by: D5 Creation | Powered by: WordPress