Most people depend on entertainment to educate themselves about real life issues. People learn different things from the actors and actresses in television shows. Most people have learned many things from the television like medical practices. For instance, people have learned how to care for various diseases and avoid them by watching television. The same principle is used to understand the court hearings and the judicial system in the country. The media has been used to portray the courts and judicial systems.
For instance, most people act as lawyers and judges in the media fir entertainment. There is a wide range of reality based court shows on the media like the law and order and the divorce court. Other shows include Judge Judy and peoples court. Apart from the television, the court and judicial system has been portrayed in many books like the runaway jury and the a few good men. It has also been depicted in various movies like the law and order. Most people do not understand the judicial system in schools or in the media. This has forced televisions to use various shows to educate people on the judicial process (Harr &Hess, 2007).
There is a great difference between the fictional portrayal of the court and reality. The trial process in fictional court rooms is shown differently from the trial process in real life. First, the trial process shown in television shows and movies are fast. In this case, the actions happen fast. For instance, the judges in the court room make quick decisions. The judges do not carry out enough investigation as required as the process is not real. Instead, the judges use fake evidence during the trial. In addition, the fictional courts in the shows fake witnesses (May, Minor &Rudell, 2007).
The witnesses may either give false evidence or the right evidence. In some cases, the audience is always aware that the evidence being presented is fake. Hence, the decision made by the judge during this time is not always correct and the audience is always aware that the decision is not ethical. In other cases, the defense attorneys present evidence at the last minute. The evidence presented influences the decision being made by the judge as the judge has to review his or her decision. The evidence presented proves the person accused is innocent.
After proving the person accused is innocent, the judges do not continue carrying out investigation instead the judges end the trial which is not accepted in criminal justice. In criminal justice, the judges are supposed to carry out further investigations until they indemnify the person who has committed the crime. Moreover, the fictional court processes do not observe all the rights granted to the suspect and the witness. In some court processes, the defense attorneys do not respect the right of the witnesses and the criminal.
For instance, the attorneys express publicly the suspects private information. This threatens the suspects and makes it difficulty for the witnesses to give the right information. The attorney is not supposed to express suspects personal information without the consent of the suspect. The fictional court process is always influenced by corruptions and other malpractices. For instance, some of the characters try to influence the lawyers, judges and the attorney by bribing them to implicate some one else in the crime. This in turn influences the outcome of the trial (Gibson &Cavadino, 2008).
On the other hand, in reality, the court process is always organized. In this case, the activities in the court are not done fast, but judges follow the right procedure. In reality the trial process starts after the criminal is arrested. The suspect is supposed to be brought before the court within 2 hours after arrest or 48 hours. During this time, the judge should inform the criminal of his rights. After that, the judge can release the suspect on bail if he has not committed murder. Judges play various reasons when carrying out the trial.
For instance, the judges are required to carry out thorough investigation on the crime. This is to enable them to make decisions that are ethical. It also helps prevent the negative effects caused by poor decision making like sentencing innocent people. The judges should carry out a series of investigation so as to ensure good outcome. This is in contrast to the fictional portraying of court processes as stated above. During the trial process judges only use the right evidence to prosecute the suspect. The judges avoid using evidences that are not inline with the criminal law to prosecute the suspect. This helps ensure the judges make the right decision.
In addition, the judges respect the rights of the witnesses and the suspect. In this case, the witness can decoded to give information about the crime or keep quiet. The judge has no right to force the witnesses to speak. Also, the judges ensure the rights accounted to the suspect in the constitution are respected. For instance, the judges do not disclose private information without getting permission from the suspect and witnesses. The attorney and the suspect are allowed to question the credibility of the witness brought before the court. This is to ensure the information provided by the witness is valid.
In the fictional portray of the court, the suspect and the attorneys do not have the right to question the credibility of the witness so as not to influence the outcome of the show. Additionally, the judges do not allow any evidence to be presented abruptly as it might not be valid (Gibson &Cavadino, 2008). The fictional courtroom is not a reliable source that can be used to understand the court system. This is because it influences peoples perception about the courtroom. Most shows do not respect criminal rights and witness rights and this affects audiences views on the court system.
Most audience views the court rooms as in effective and unable to fulfill the needs of the clients. They also see the judges being corrupt and this affects the delivery of services to the citizens. Not all judges are corrupt, incompetent and dishonest. A large percentage of the judges are committed to their work. The judges are honest, fair and respect the rights of the suspect and the witness. Hence, the fictional courts are not a real representation of the actual courts as they differ a lot from the actual courts (Gibson &Cavadino, 2008).
May,D.C.,Minor,K.I.,&Rudell,R.(2007).Corrections and the Criminal Justice System. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2007
Harr,J.S.,&Hess,K.M.(2007).Constitutional Law and the Criminal Justice System.Cengage Learning
James Peter is the author and is associated with meldaresearch.com which is a global custom thesis writing provider. If you would like help in essays, research papers, term papers and dissertations, you can visit BestEssaySite.Com